Skip to content

dts: esp32c6: fix: remove references to removed rtc node #90976

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Remove remaining references. Fixes breakages seen in main-line CI.

Signed-off-by: Luis Ubieda <luisf@croxel.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added area: RISCV RISCV Architecture (32-bit & 64-bit) platform: ESP32 Espressif ESP32 labels Jun 2, 2025
@ubieda ubieda added Hotfix Fix for issues blocking development, i.e. CI issues, tests failing in CI, etc. size: XS A PR changing only a single line of code labels Jun 2, 2025
@sylvioalves
Copy link
Collaborator

sylvioalves commented Jun 2, 2025

Already merged in #90971

@ubieda
Copy link
Member Author

ubieda commented Jun 2, 2025

@sylvioalves I see the PR was merged in an hour ago, however I don't see in the diff's the rtc reference node getting removed. Am I missing something?

@sylvioalves
Copy link
Collaborator

@sylvioalves I see the PR was merged in an hour ago, however I don't see in the diff's the rtc reference node getting removed. Am I missing something?

Check again please.

@ubieda
Copy link
Member Author

ubieda commented Jun 2, 2025

Ah, I see the referenced PR just changed.

@ubieda ubieda closed this Jun 2, 2025
@ubieda ubieda deleted the hotfix/esp32c6-removal-of-rtc-references branch June 2, 2025 21:50
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area: RISCV RISCV Architecture (32-bit & 64-bit) Hotfix Fix for issues blocking development, i.e. CI issues, tests failing in CI, etc. platform: ESP32 Espressif ESP32 size: XS A PR changing only a single line of code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants